Criterion A
The Issue in the article that I choose is about how people who have online Access use online bogglers , you tube and other sites of entertainment and leisure on the web to express their political views and thoughts through those internet websites. become really interesting is that in an era when you have armed conflict between states, you now have people online looking to see how they can become part of that conflict without leaving their computers. the issue here is Rather than becoming the cafe of the world, where we interact on common ground, the Net has become a very effective place to rally people to your own cause and try to coordinate their but actions.

Criterion B
Facebook , Myspace and youtube are mostly websited for social networking that helps you keep in touch with friends, even ones you haven't seen in years. You can join networks which are basically schools and regions to find people in the same area. Once you sign up, you can find your , friends already using facebook by entering your AIM screen name, email, the same things with Myspace but If you are wondering about the technical side it's a complex CMS (Content Management System) that runs from multiple servers and databases.in general its a web based
application that runs on many servers and databases. but youtube is a different situation provides the code you need to place a single video on your site but I have a feeling you want to allow users to upload their own video files and then play them. What you want done isn't a walk in the park and it can take some time to do. A step by step procedure is out of the question. Here is the basic method though.
1. Allow user to upload video.
2. Convert video to .flv format.
3. Use dynamic urls to play the .flv file in a prebuilt flash video player
Criterion C
These new forms of communication have the potential to allow people to communicate and exchange ideas across vast distances and political spheres. With every new technology like that, we tend to speculate about the future and say it's going to be more democratic, but we never know. We never predicted for example that the development of video is going to lead to video games so we don't know what the future is. companies such as Facebook and MySpace to what people are deciding is cool and what isn't, to how bloggers living under oppressive regimes are organizing political demonstrations and how these same regimes are reading blogs in order to put down these very same protests.A possible impact is youth voting rates and whether websites such as Facebook will help. Every new technology brings with it the possibility that it is going to increase youth voting rates but instead, we've seen it continue to decrease. with every new technology there is a level of cynicism that tends to get associated with [it] that might mitigate against those kinds of things. At the same time, they are great for creating kinds of fads, so there are a small number of people in your Facebook community that might become . interested or fascinated by the same thing. It is a mobilizing tool mainly within the Internet, because these are people who are not coming here tonight, but they are people who are sitting at their keyboards They can express enormous support but they do not necessarily have the social and economic base to development a commitment to go out and vote or give thier general
Opinion outside where they can be heard. .
Criterion D
. A simple solution for that Issue is that groups blogs and Videos can be censored . Certain restrictions and rules could be applied so that political views are presented within reason. The real problem here is that people are not going outside to prtest in the real world where they views and Opinions would be find better Listeners, where what they have to say would be heard. Outside in the real world. So there should be a provided system. Where those people who meet online through bloggers and groups could take there Opinions outside, and do more typing what the have to say